Cover to the Penguin Group book. Death of a Salesman is a 1949 play by Arthur Miller, his most famous and commonly revived work. Viewed by many as a caustic attack on the American Dream of success through economic enterprise, it made both Arthur Miller and lead character Willy Loman household names. It was greeted with enthusiastic reviews, received the Pulitzer Prize for Drama in 1949, the 1949 Tony Award for Best Play, and turned Miller into a national sensation as a playwright. Contents 1 Plot synopsis 2 Themes and points of interest 3 Film and television versions 4 Requiem 5 Bibliography Plot synopsis Spoiler warning: Plot and/or ending details follow. The play centers on Willy Loman, an aging salesman who is beginning to lose his grip on reality. Willy places great emphasis on his supposed native charm and ability to make friends; stating that once he was known throughout New England, driving long hours but making unparalleled sales (something true only because of his philandering with secretaries), his sons Biff and Happy were the pride and joy of the neighborhood, and his wife Linda went smiling throughout the day. Unfortunately, time has passed, and now his life seems to be slipping out of control. Willy has worked hard his entire life and ought to be retiring by now, living a life of luxury and closing deals with contractors on the phone—especially since increasing episodes of depersonalization and flashback are impairing his ability to drive. Instead, all of Willy's aspirations seem to have failed: he is fired from his job—which barely paid enough anyway—by a man young enough to be his son and who, in fact, Willy himself named. Willy is now forced to rely on loans from his only real friend (and the word is used loosely at that), Charley, to make ends meet. None of Willy's old friends or previous customers remember him. Biff, his 34-year-old son, has been unable to 'find himself' as a result of his inability to settle down (caused by Willy drumming into him the need to 'make it big within two weeks'), and Happy, the younger son, lies shamelessly to make it look like he is a perfect Loman scion. In contrast, Charley (who, Willy tells his boys conspiratorially, is not well-liked), is now a successful businessman, and his son, Bernard, a former bespectacled bookworm, is now a brilliant lawyer. We are told how Willy had at least one affair while out on business trips, one particularly that was witnessed by Biff (which broke his faith in Willy). Finally, Willy is haunted by memories of his now-dead older brother, Ben, who at an early age left for Africa: "And when I walked out, I was rich!" With all this in mind, it is perhaps not surprising that Willy is having suicidal thoughts, though Biff and Happy—both home for the first time in years—initially have no idea. The play's structure resembles a stream of consciousness account: Willy drifts between his living room, downstage, to the apron and flashbacks of an idyllicized past, and also to fantasized conversations with Ben. The use of these different 'states' allows Miller to contrast Willy's dreams and the reality of his life in extraordinary detail, and also allows him to contrast the characters themselves, showing them in both sympathetic and villainous light, gradually unfolding the story, and refusing to allow the audience a permanent judgment about anyone. When we are in the present the characters abide by the rules of the set, entering only through the stage door to the left, however when we visit Willy's 'past' these rules are removed, with characters openly moving through walls. Whereas the term 'flashback' as a form of cinematography for these scenes is often heard, Miller himself rather speaks of 'mobile concurrencies'. In fact, flashbacks would show an objective image of the past. Miller's mobile concurrencies, however, rather show highly subjective memories. Furthermore, Willy destroys the boundaries between past and present, and the two start to exist in parallel. The depths of the problem are gradually revealed. Willy's emphasis on being well-liked stems from a belief that it will bring him to perfect success—not a harmful dream in itself, except that he clings to this idea as if it is a life-preserver, refusing to give it up. His boys are not only well-liked but quite handsome, and as far as Willy is concerned, that's all anyone needs. He pitches this idea to his sons so effectively that they believe opportunity will fall into their laps. (In this way, Biff and Happy can be considered forerunners to the culture of entitlement.) Of course, real life is not so generous, and neither are able to hold much in the way of respectable employment. Willy witnesses his and his sons' failures and clings ever more tightly to his master plan, now placing his hopes vicariously on them: he may not succeed, but they might. His tragic flaw is in failing to question whether the dream is valid. Happy never does either; he has embraced his father's attitude, and at the end of the first act, he convinces Biff to seek financial backing in a get-rich-quick scheme. But when Biff tries to do so, he realizes his father's mistakes, and finally decides not to let Willy get away with it. They attack each other at the play's climax: Biff confronting Willy's neurosis head-on, while Willy accuses Biff of throwing his life away simply to hurt Willy's feelings. Despite a raggedly emotional battle of words, neither is able to make much headway, but before Biff gives up, he breaks down in tears: "Will you take that phony dream and burn it before something happens?" Willy is touched that Biff still cares for him after all. As the rest of the family retires, Ben reappears over Willy's shoulder. Willy proclaims that in taking his own life, the attendance at his funeral would make a show to his doubting son of how popular he was in life, and that, if handled to look accidental, the payout from his life insurance policy will allow Biff to start his own business. The neighborhood is drawn out of bed by the roar and smash of Willy's car, despite Ben's warnings that the insurance policy won't be honored in the event of suicide. Thus Willy's grand gesture - and indeed his earlier assertion that one is often "worth more dead than alive" - leaves his family (and especially his wife) in even worse a position than before. Themes and points of interest One central point of the play is the idea of "greatness." Willy longs to achieve great things as a salesman and to be remembered after his death, and instills this hope in both of his sons. All three fail, while Ben, Charley, and Bernard succeed. Why? Do the Loman men have a tragic flaw? What could it be? The differing interpretations of the American Dream are another major theme throughout the play. Biff and Willy both have very different ideas about what it is - Biff dreams purely of the free and open (shown through his desire to be 'out there...working with our hands'), while Willy is trapped in between this dream and that of the capitalist materialistic modern society. Happy carries on Willy's ideas through the play, and by the Requiem, decides to carry on Willy's dreams and desires. The premium we place on superficial qualities is another common theme throughout the play. The physical good looks of Biff, the importance of being liked and even the attendance at one's own funeral are traits that drive Willy to his demise. Self-Deception and Illusion are important in this play. All of the characters deceive themselves away from reality through lies. Willy lives in the past to escape the financial troubles of reality. He also has a false image of success as requiring only easy wealth and popularity. The question is often asked of whether the play can be correctly described as a tragedy (with Willy being our tragic hero), because of the conflicting ideas over whether he is to blame for his downfall (in which case it would be tragic) or if it is society's fault (in this case it would be a social drama). Film and television versions Cover to the 1985 version 1951 - starring Fredric March, Mildred Dunnock, Kevin McCarthy and Cameron Mitchell. It was adapted by Stanley Roberts and directed by László Benedek who won the Golden Globe Award for Best Director. The film was nominated for Academy Awards for Best Actor in a Leading Role (Fredric March), Best Actor in a Supporting Role (Kevin McCarthy), Best Actress in a Supporting Role (Mildred Dunnock), Best Cinematography, Black-and-White and Best Music, Scoring of a Dramatic or Comedy Picture. 1966 - a television production starring Lee J. Cobb, Gene Wilder, Mildred Dunnock, James Farentino and George Segal. It was directed by Alex Segal. 1985 - a television production starring Dustin Hoffman, Kate Reid, John Malkovich, Stephen Lang and Charles Durning. It was directed by Volker Schlöndorff. 2000 - a television production starring Brian Dennehy, Elizabeth Franz, Ron Eldard, Ted Koch, Howard Witt and Richard Thompson. It was directed by Kirk Browning. Requiem Miller's views on the American Dream are clearly demonstrated throughout the play, but especially in the Requiem. Charley's speech, beginning 'Nobody dast blame this man.' sums up the play, and is a fantastic source to quote. 'He don't put a bolt to a nut, he don't tell you the law or give you medicine.' Here, Miller is explaining that being a Salesman does not have a fulfilling role in life. They are not part of something with potential. Building, applying the law and healing the sick are all fulfilling careers, unlike being a Salesman. 'He's a man way out there in the blue, riding on a smile and a shoeshine. And when they start not smiling back-that's an earthquake.' This is saying that the career is materialistic. All based on looks and the success of persuasion. And if the buyers stop buying, you have nothing left to fall back on, and there is an 'earthquake' 'A salesman is got to dream, boy. It comes with the territory.' This quotation is explaining that without a dream, or a purpose, the salesman ceases to exist. The dream is to sell, and if they can't sell, then they are finished. The final sentence of the speech says that salesmen have to dream, otherwise they are a failure. However, dreaming is not enough. If they can't fulfill their dream, they end up in a situation like Willy. Bibliography Born Losers: A History of Failure in America, by Scott A. Sandage (Harvard University Press, 2005). Search Term: "Death_of_a_Salesman" Categories: 1951 films | 1966 films | 1985 films | 2000 films | Best Actor Oscar Nominee (film) | Best Supporting Actor Oscar Nominee (film) | U.S. plays